In 33 U.S. Cities, Feeding The Homeless Has Been Criminalized

The news: The United States’ problem with homelessness is bad enough already, but a forthcoming National Coalition for the Homeless (NCH) report saying that 33 U.S. cities now ban or are considering banning the practice of sharing food with homeless people, is going to push things over the edge. Four municipalities (Raleigh, N.C.; Myrtle Beach, S.C.; Birmingham, Ala.; and Daytona Beach, Fla.) have recently gone as far as to fine, remove or threaten to throw in jail private groups that work to feed those in need instead of letting government-run services do the job.

Why it’s happening: The bans are officially instituted to prevent government-run anti-homelessness programs from being diluted. But in practice, many of the same places that are banning food-sharing are the same ones that have criminalized homelessness with harsh and punitive measures. Essentially, they’re designed to make being homeless within city limits so unpleasant that these people have no choice but to leave. Tampa, for example, criminalizes sleeping or storing property in public. Columbia, South Carolina, passed a measure that would have allowed police to expel all homeless people out of town. Detroit PD officers have been accused of illegally taking the homeless and driving them out of the city.

The U.N., deeply concerned, sounded the alarm to the United States, in a report on human rights, saying criminalization of homelessness in the United States “raises concerns of discrimination and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.”

“I’m just simply baffled by the idea that people can be without shelter in a country, and then be treated as criminals for being without shelter,” said human rights lawyer Sir Nigel Rodley, chairman of the U.N. committee. “The idea of criminalizing people who don’t have shelter is something that I think many of my colleagues might find as difficult as I do to even begin to comprehend.”

Meanwhile, the programs in place to support the homeless are typically inefficient, making claims that ending food-sharing is for their own good specious at best. According to government data, about 600,000 people are homeless on any given night. According to the NCH, one survey of homelessness found 62,619 veterans were homeless in January 2012. Other at-risk groups for homelessness include the seriously ill, battered women and people suffering from drug addictions or mental illness. The economy isn’t helping. More Americans live in poverty than before the recession began in 2008 and the number of households living under the poverty line has reached levels unprecedented since the 1960s.

Some city officials, like Houston’s Mayor Annise Parker, claim that “making it easier for someone to stay on the streets is not humane” and say that uncoordinated charity efforts “keep them on the street longer, which is what happens when you feed them.” A local Food Not Bombs activist told VICE that the actual effect was to daunt locals from giving out food. Other cities are even harsher. In 2011, more than 20 members of Food Not Bombs were arrested in Orlando for sharing food. Love Wins Ministries in Raleigh was threatened with arrest for giving biscuits to the homeless. Daytona Beach fined, harassed and threatened jail time for Debbie and Chico Jimenez, who run a ministry called “Spreading the Word Without Saying a Word.”

“Homeless people are visible in downtown America. And cities think by cutting off the food source it will make the homeless go away. It doesn’t, of course,” NCH community organizing director Michael Stoops told NBC News. “We want to get cities to quit doing this. We support the right of all people to share food.”

Why you should care. This is pure cruelty. The homeless are also human beings and we owe to treat them this way. And if a city bans sharing our food surplus with them, it certainly isn't a good sign. Meanwhile, successful programs have reported that systematically providing housing and food for the homeless costs society much less than abandon them on the streets.

At the end, if we criminalize charity, what kind of humans, does this action make us?

Share on Google+